This product has been identified as a supplement, consumable product, cosmetic, or topical product that makes prohibited disease claims

The notice reads:

This product has been identified as a supplement, consumable product, cosmetic, or topical product that makes prohibited disease claims. Products that make disease claims are prohibited from sale and listing on Amazon. For more information, please see: [Seller Central policy link] For reinstatement, please remove the prohibited disease claim from the detail page and appeal the restriction. Please note that if the disease claim is on the product labeling, there may not be a path to reinstatement.

Most sellers read the first two sentences, remove some wording, and appeal.

Read the last sentence again. It is doing far more work than its placement suggests, and it determines whether this costs you two days or ends the ASIN permanently.

First, find out which situation you are in

There are two versions of this notice, and they are not close to equivalent.

The claim is in your listing content — title, bullets, description, A+ content, backend search terms. This is recoverable. Remove it, appeal, move on.

The claim is on your physical packaging — printed on the label, visible in your product images. This one may not be recoverable at all, and continuing to appeal will not change that.

So before you edit anything, go and look at your own label. Not the listing. The pack.

Why the packaging case is different

Amazon’s position, as stated to sellers directly: reformulating a label does not make the existing ASIN compliant. Remove the claims from the product label and create a new ASIN for the corrected product.

That is worth stating plainly, because it is the opposite of what almost everyone assumes. The ASIN does not come back once a prohibited claim has been on the packaging associated with it. Updating the artwork does not clear it. Sending new photographs does not clear it. Appealing repeatedly does not clear it.

The path is: fix the packaging, generate a new UPC, create a new listing, and rebuild that product’s history from zero. Painful — and considerably less painful than discovering it after two months of appeals.

”But my product makes no claims”

This is the most common reaction, and it is wrong more often than it is right.

One seller was flagged on a culinary spice and was certain it was an error — no supplement positioning, no medical language, an ordinary grocery item. The offending text was a single line printed in the bottom corner of the pack, noting that the spices may offer benefits such as potent anti-inflammatory properties and antioxidants.

That is a disease claim. It was on the label. The ASIN was not recoverable.

Things that count and routinely surprise people:

• Anything on the packaging, including small print, badges and back-panel copy
• Ingredient benefit language — “known for its anti-inflammatory properties”
• Hedged phrasing — “may help support”, “traditionally used for”. Hedging does not convert a disease claim into a permitted one
• Conditions, not just diseases — blood sugar, blood pressure, inflammation, anxiety, joint pain
• Review quotes or Q&A content you have reproduced in your own copy
• A+ content and brand story modules, which sellers forget are part of the detail page

Detection is automated. It reads your images. It does not know what you meant.

If the claim is only in listing content

1. Find every instance. Title, bullets, description, A+ content, backend search terms, image overlays and infographics. A clean rewrite of the bullets with a stale claim baked into image four still gets flagged.
2. Check the variations. Children inherit suppression from a shared root violation. A clean parent with a dirty child stays suppressed.
3. Remove rather than soften. “May support a healthy inflammatory response” is not a materially safer version of “anti-inflammatory”. Take the concept out.
4. Then appeal, and say what you removed and where. Do not argue the flag was wrong — even where you believe it was, that framing does not move automated review.

If the claim is on the label

1. Stop appealing. Each templated rejection costs days and changes nothing.
2. Confirm it with Amazon in writing if you can, so the decision to abandon the ASIN is based on their position rather than your inference.
3. Correct the packaging with your manufacturer, and audit every other SKU using the same artwork template at the same time — the line that got flagged is usually on more than one pack.
4. Create a new ASIN with a new UPC for the corrected product, and plan for rebuilding reviews and ranking from nothing.

The appeal rejection you will probably see

If your first appeal argued the flag was mistaken, the reply is usually this:

We have received your request for review of the following product(s) and after careful consideration have determined that the product(s) does not meet the necessary criteria and will be restricted post the grace period.

It is a template. It does not mean anyone weighed your argument, and it carries no information about what specifically is wrong. Treat it as a signal to go and find the offending wording rather than as an invitation to explain yourself more clearly.

The wider pattern

Amazon’s compliance review reads your whole product — listing text, backend fields, images and label artwork — not the part you were thinking about when you wrote the copy. The most expensive mistake in this category is assuming a claim lives where you put it, when the review is looking at a photograph of your packaging.

Keep reading: How to fix a listing suppressed for an ingredient claim · Reinstating after a cGMP deactivation · When you actually need a Prop 65 warning